Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2011
Publication Title
Critique of Anthropology
Volume
31
Abstract
Since the 1980s, neoliberal globalization fostered an upsurge of grassroots social movements in Latin America that sought alternatives to increasing poverty and social exclusion. Social movement scholars often interpret these movements as morally noble models of democracy given their claims to social justice and equity. My research examines the forced seizure of a closed Mexican sugar mill and establishment of a cooperative, worker-run factory by a grassroots movement whose cultural politics aimed at creating more democratic processes. Yet in 2009, after 11 years of success, movement leaders declared the mill bankrupt and shut it down. The façade of unity presented by activists obscured internal divisions and hierarchical control that beleaguered the movement. I argue that a more nuanced and critical analysis that takes into consideration the contradictions and paradoxes that may be present in grassroots struggles reframes essentialist conceptions regarding the intrinsic virtuosity of grassroots social movements.
Issue
4
First Page
293
Last Page
311
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0308275X11420114
ISSN
1460-3721
Rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Chollett, Donna, ""Like an Ox Yoke": Challenging the Intrinsic Virtuosity of a Grassroots Social Movement" (2011). Anthropology Publications. 7.
https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/anthropology/7
Primo Type
Article
Included in
Latin American Studies Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Social Justice Commons
Comments
This is an Accepted Version of the article published in Critique of Anthropology. The final published version can be found on the publisher's website. The citation for the published version is:
Chollett, Donna. 2011. Like an ox yoke': Challenging the intrinsic virtuosity of a grassroots social movement. Critique of Anthropology 31(4):293-311.